Who owns See Jane?
Have you ever wondered why we don't see more girls as lead characters in children's movies and shows? Have you ever stopped to figure out the ratio of boys and girls as characters period? Well earlier this year, Dads & Daughters, released a study through the See Jane program, about gender and racial disparity in TV shows. In 2006 they released a studies about gender, gender roles for boys, and occupation in G-rated movies. All fabu work!
The See Jane program was touted with Geena Davis' name attached on press releases and fund raising efforts. When I first saw all this, I thought two things: WOW! About time! and Go Geena!
But today I read a story via the Chronicle of Philanthropy that Geena is now suing for ownership of the See Jane program. It boils down to who came up with the idea.
I know that it's very hard to conceive an idea, hand it over to someone else to run with, and then see things not going as well as you had hoped. I have no idea if this is what is really happening though. As I said, I just want them to go back to the research that makes us go Hmm....
Here are some findings from the various research reports:
X-posted at the Red Thread at Chicago Parent
Technorati tags: feminist, Das and Daughters, Geena Davis, See Jane, movies
The See Jane program was touted with Geena Davis' name attached on press releases and fund raising efforts. When I first saw all this, I thought two things: WOW! About time! and Go Geena!
But today I read a story via the Chronicle of Philanthropy that Geena is now suing for ownership of the See Jane program. It boils down to who came up with the idea.
In 2004, Davis allegedly conceived the See Jane program, for which she has since raised $750,000, according to the suit. She actively promoted the program while working with Dads and Daughters.
See Jane's mission initially focused on research. According to a See Jane-sponsored study released in March, the way gender is portrayed on television can critically impact a child's development, particularly the "task of integrating what it means to be male or female into their own personalities."
According to her suit, Davis always maintained "complete and exclusive control of the See Jane concept."
I love both See Jane and Dads & Daughters, so I hope that they can come to a good conclusion without bankrupting D&D. They are doing such great work together and I hope that this is just a tussle and they can go back to viewing what our children are watching through that gender lens.
I know that it's very hard to conceive an idea, hand it over to someone else to run with, and then see things not going as well as you had hoped. I have no idea if this is what is really happening though. As I said, I just want them to go back to the research that makes us go Hmm....
Here are some findings from the various research reports:
- In the 101 studied films, there are three male characters for every one female character.
- Fewer than one out of three (28 percent) of the speaking characters (both real and animated) are female.
- G-rated films show few examples of male characters as parents or as partners in a marriage or committed relationship.
- Almost twice as many non-white males (62%) as white males (37.6%) are portrayed as physically aggressive or violent.
- In...G-rated movies, whether animated or live-action, the most common occupation for female characters is white collar work, such as clerical and secretarial positions.
- The top three jobs for male characters are white collar, blue collar and military.
- Three quarters of all the single, speaking characters on children’s television were White, giving young television viewers a distorted ethnic worldview.
- In live-action children’s TV (shows using human actors), 53.9 percent of characters were male and 46.1 percent were female. This translates into a ratio of 1.17 males to every 1 female—the most balanced ratio among forms of children’s electronic entertainment.
X-posted at the Red Thread at Chicago Parent
Technorati tags: feminist, Das and Daughters, Geena Davis, See Jane, movies