Skip to main content

Sarah Palin was right! Evidence of death panels in Chicago

Palin just got the location incorrect. Rather than death panels being a part of health care reform, death panels are alive and well in current insurance policies:
In the days after a football injury left Eisenhower High School running back Rasul "Rocky" Clark paralyzed from the neck down, he was showered with attention from medical professionals and assured by school officials that he would be well taken care of, he said.

For nearly a decade Clark enjoyed superb medical care — nurses in his home around the clock, access to pain medicines and prescriptions and a storeroom of supplies.

Now the $5 million insurance policy that once covered Clark's medical care has reached its lifetime maximum and come to an end — and along with it, many of the benefits he once enjoyed. Those benefits may have kept him healthy enough to surpass the life expectancy for most quadriplegics, his mother and primary physician said.

"I was told I'd be taken care of all of my life," Clark, 27, said from his bed in his modest house in south suburban Robbins. "That was one thing that brought me comfort. I knew I'd be OK.

"Now it seems like I'm being penalized for living too long. That's how I see it."
I'm sure that the lifetime cap was set by a team of actuaries who figured out the average or maybe even the best case scenario for someone who becomes a quadripledic. Only that medical care has advanced enough to allow this young man to live for much longer than expected.

Yes, he's being punished for living too long.
Yes, the insurance company's decision is a death sentence.
But no, I don't see Sarah Palin jetting out to rally with this young man and his tired mom. She won't be fighting for his life. Nor can I imagine any of the Republicans who went on and on about death panels or swear they are pro-life.

But I sure would love to be proven wrong. Come on Sarah, prove me wrong!

BTW - If anyone knows of a site where people can donate to Clark's care, please leave it in the comments. Thanks!

Comments

Pippi said…
Rather, it points to what is likely to happen when there is limited money to go around in ANY health insurance program.

If you read the fine print of the health care bill, you will see that a great deal of latitude and decision-making is given to non-elected officials when it comes to making such decisions.

Well, we recently passed a health care bill we cannot afford, on top of bailouts that have sunk us further into the hole. What miracle rabbit are we going to pull out of a hat to avoid the same sort of scenario with a public health plan?

One sensible solution is to reduce our need for health care in the first place. Find cures and educate people so they can make better lifestyle choices. But the National Cancer Institute, whose employee was a member of the research team that found that women who have had abortions have increased risks of breast cancer, tried to deny it for like 9 months. What's up with that? People who are SUPPOSED to have our back are in bed with others for money (now that oral contraceptives and abortion are linked with increased cancer risk, Susan G. Komen for the cure seems to think that giving money to purveyors of abortion and contraceptives is a better idea than researching cures for breast cancer and finding what it is about abortion and oral contraceptives are involved, and trying to fix it. (Has it ever occurred to you why money-making non-profits never seem to find cures, but end up perpetuating themselves indefinitely?)

As usual, follow the money to find your answers.
Veronica said…
Oh Pippi...take your abortion = cancer fairy tale outta here.
Pippi said…
This may offend your world view, but these are facts. Besides, I didn't say that abortion + cancer, only that research shows a significantly higher risk of cancer when a woman has had an abortion. The level of significance varies in the different studies around the world, but all are significant enough to report. Space is limited on these boards, I had to delete a lot.
Pippi said…
As for death panels, the fine print is in place.

We have some vocal backers for the idea, like Bill Gates, openly in favor of death panels.

The idea of euthanasia, made popular in Nazi Germany (and which, incidentally, was the inspiration for Planned Parenthood to help reduce the black population as much as it was about reproductive freedom for women), is alive and well on both sides of the Atlantic, and wherever health care is socialized, it becomes an optional means of budget balancing.

The Netherlands has had a lot of press about their steps toward legalizing euthanasia of many people, including children.

Canada and a family have been in a dispute over the value of the life of a child, Baby Joseph.

http://www.stthomastimesjournal.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=2995393

Canada's socialized medicine program has also canceled surgeries for many months in one of its provinces, due to budget problems. Too bad so sad for those who needed surgery to stay alive.

If we pursue socialized medicine, especially as we are doing with gigantic debt to start with, both the budget and the rapidly changing view of the value of human life will inevitably lead to rationing of human life. All the arrows point in that direction.
Pippi said…
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/01/06/EDGOQAL6VE1.DTL

Only 840 euthanized without their consent in The Netherlands. Not bad, huh?

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Mary: The Adventures of Mary Shelley's Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Granddaughter

Mary: The Adventures of Mary Shelley's Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Granddaughter by Brea Grant My rating: 4 of 5 stars View all my reviews

Frederick, A Virtual Puppet Performance - Read by Michael Shannon

WOW...this is my first post during the Coronavirus pandemic! I hope you and your loved ones are healthy and safe. Thanks to the Chicago Children’s Theatre, the city’s largest professional theater devoted exclusively to children and families, for launching a new YouTube channel, CCTv: Virtual Theatre and Learning from Chicago Children’s Theatre. To kick if off we are treated to Frederick. Here's hoping this helps with your little ones. Or is a comfort to everyone of all ages. Chicago Children’s Theatre’s all-new virtual puppet performance was created while all of the artists were sheltering in place, working with resources limited to what they had in their homes or on their laptops. Frederick is directed by CCT Co-Founder and Artistic Director Jacqueline Russell. Puppets and sets were designed, built and puppeteered in a home studio by Grace Needlman and Will Bishop, CCT’s Director of Production, the creative team behind CCT’s annual series of Beatrix Potter puppet show

Book Review: Wolfpack by Abby Wambach

Less than a year ago, Abby Wambach took the stage at Barnard's commencement and gave a speech that shook many, including myself, to the core . Her speech went viral and I made the above image in order to share the highlights of her speech. Earlier this month Abby released the speech in book form. Wolfpack : How to Come Together, Unleash Our Power, and Change the Game is short (less than 100 pages) but is much more than just her speech . You get a peek into how the speech came together and why she said everything. And because the book is short and is an expanded speech, it moves quickly. I feel that it moves with the same ferocity that Abby use to move down a soccer field. And you might find yourself cheering as she takes you through the story. Abby has always been one of my favorite players. The way she ran amok on the pitch was exactly the way I felt I played sports. Never caring how you looked and giving it your all. Leaving it all on the field. When she retired from socc